JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 28, 2024

A- de 2024

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger

✓Claimant Bernal Cano Natalia·Respondent --

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad En Proceso De Constitucionalidad
  • Requisitos formales y materiales
  • Rechazar por incumplimiento de carga argumentativa
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad parcial del proceso de la referencia, formulada por la doctora Natalia Bernal Cano.

Luego de analizar los diferentes argumentos presentados por la demandante, encontró la Corte que no se satisfizo el requisito de carga argumentativa mínima exigida para este tipo de solicitudes y que tampoco se evidenció la vulneración del derecho al debido proceso y al principio de igualdad alegados por ella.

Con base en lo anterior se RECHAZÓ DE PLANO la nulidad invocada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR DE PLANO la solicitud de nulidad parcial, desde el 9 de noviembre de 2023, propuesta por la demandante.
  2. SEGUNDO. En contra de este auto no procede recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.